Politics Added 7d ago 23 outlets · 23 articles

Supreme Court rules 6-3 in Louisiana v. Callais that Louisiana's second majority-Black congressional district is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, narrowing Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, striking down Louisiana's second majority-Black congressional district as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion, holding that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional racial discrimination to challenge redistricting maps, raising the bar significantly from the previous results-based standard established in Thornburg v. Gingles (1986). Justice Elena Kagan dissented for the three liberal justices, writing that the decision renders Section 2 'all but a dead letter.'

68
Divergence score
This event sits in the top 1% of divergence this week. 23 outlets covered it, splitting into 23 framing camps across 4 bias groups.
23 camps
4 bias groups
The spectrum · how 23 outlets placed this story
LeftCenterRight
Mother Jones
ABC News
Washington Examiner
Al Jazeera
Reason
The Federalist
Axios
CNN
Daily Wire
AP News
Breitbart
BBC
Washington Post
Reuters
Wall Street Journal
The Hill
PBS NewsHour
NY Post
NPR
National Review
Politico
HuffPost
New York Times
Horizontal = outlet biasColor = this story's framing
Supportive of action
Neutral
Dismissive
Critical
Alarmist
International angle
The split, in one line
Conservative outlets frame the ruling as...
How each outlet covered it
Mother JonesLeft6d ago
Supreme Court Deals a Death Blow to the Voting Rights Act
ABC NewsLeft-Center7d ago
5 things to know about the Supreme Court's landmark decision on the Voting Rights Act
Washington ExaminerRight6d ago
Supreme Court's Louisiana redistricting ruling poised to wipe out House Democrats in the South
Al JazeeraIntl7d ago
US top court voids Louisiana voting map amid national redistricting fight
ReasonRight-Center6d ago
SCOTUS Narrows the Reach of the Voting Rights Act
The FederalistRight7d ago
Supreme Court Smacks Down Rampant Race-Based Gerrymandering
AxiosCenter6d ago
What a weakened Voting Rights Act means in today's America
CNNLeft7d ago
Big voting rights ruling, fighting hackers, foods linked to dementia: Catch up on the day's stories
Daily WireRight7d ago
Dems Erupt After SCOTUS Rules On Race-Based Districts
AP NewsCenter
Supreme Court voids majority Black congressional district in Louisiana, boosting Republican chances
BreitbartRight7d ago
Obama Slams Supreme Court Ruling Voiding Race-Based Gerrymandering
BBCIntl7d ago
US Supreme Court limits use of race in drawing electoral maps
Washington PostLeft7d ago
The Latest: Supreme Court weakens a key tool of the Voting Rights Act
ReutersCenter7d ago
US Supreme Court guts key provision of Voting Rights Act
Wall Street JournalRight-Center7d ago
Supreme Court Curbs Protections for Minority Voters in Election Maps
The HillCenter6d ago
Why the voting rights ruling could hurt Democrats in the South
PBS NewsHourCenter7d ago
How the Supreme Court's decision weakens the Voting Rights Act nationwide
NY PostRight7d ago
How Supreme Court's ban on racial gerrymandering affects California
NPRLeft6d ago
Supreme Court calls Louisiana's House map an 'unconstitutional racial gerrymander'
National ReviewRight6d ago
A Righteous Blow Against Racial Gerrymandering
PoliticoCenter7d ago
The Voting Rights Act is now a 'dead letter' after latest Supreme Court decision
HuffPostLeft7d ago
Supreme Court Eviscerates The Voting Rights Act
New York TimesLeft6d ago
In Blow to Voting Rights Act, Supreme Court Embraces Claim of Racial Progress
Fact ledger · what actually happened, cross-checked